Power Relations Exposed in Truth and PowerIn "Truth and Power" Michel Foucault revisits the main theoretical trends and questions of his career. He is a thinker who knows no limits of topic or field. His ideas range from literature to science, from psychology to work. Deal with a currency accepted everywhere: truth and power. Foucault spends much of his career tracing the threads of truth and power as they intertwine with the history of human experience. He especially loves studying asylums and prisons because they are close to an encapsulated power structure. Using techniques gleaned from psychology, politics, anthropology, sociology, and archaeology, Foucault presents a highly politicized analysis of the flow of power and power relations. appeared as "Interview with Miche Foucault" in Microfiseca del Poetere in 1977. The interviewers first ask Foucault to revisit some of his earlier ideas and to trace the path of his career. Foucault began to consider mental asylums and tried to create his theories with an eye towards left-wing French politics. He soon turned to the evaluation of other sciences such as biology, political economy and medicine, and conceived the concept of discontinuity: "It seemed to me that... the pace of transformation does not follow the fluid and continuous patterns of development that are normally accepted." The idea of ​​discontinuity became a label that other critics and thinkers applied to him, much to his dismay. Foucault only wanted to show the susceptibility of sciences and scientific statements to the pressures of power: At this level it is not so much a question of knowing which external power imposes itself on science, but of which effects of power circulate among scientific statements, which ones it constitutes, for so to speak, their internal regime of power, and how and why at certain moments that regime undergoes a global modification. This idea echoes Thomas Kuhn's ideas about paradigm shifts in a science, and even echoes Dryden's claims about the "paradigm shifts" of every era. universal genius." Dryden stated that in every generation there is a general inclination of thought that affects all disciplines. Kuhn spread the idea that the great revolutions in science are due to great paradigm shifts. The discussion then moves on to structuralism , where Foucault makes some important statements about the structure of history: “I don't see anyone who could be more anti-structuralist than me”..