This video is about a group of 12 different men who serve on a jury to determine whether or not a boy is guilty of murder. Even before each of these jurors heard how the case was explained, they still each had their own opinions about how it actually happened. As they began, juror number 8 took the stand to plead not guilty. This started the conflict between each of the jurors. Everyone wanted to argue that he was definitely guilty because of what they had heard in the courtroom. Juror 8 used some sound reasoning to convince Juror 9 that the boy might not have been guilty. Everyone else still maintains that the boy is guilty. Eventually, with further reasoning, the others began to understand how the boy could be proven not guilty. Each of these men had their own personality and opinions on the case. Juror 1 was the leader of the group. He was in charge of keeping the meeting together and also bringing the evidence for the group to see. Juror 2 was quiet and had his own way of thinking. He was an older man but knowledgeable and logical in what he said. Juror 3 was ...