So the act of sending one country's armed forces to another country, thus violating its territorial integrity, can be seen as an imposition of one's beliefs and ideas on another country. The danger is that just because something might work very well for one country, like democracy in America, it might not work as well elsewhere with a completely different culture. A similar example is conceivable if England, which historically earned much of its income through shipping goods abroad by sea, sought to help a landlocked country grow a better economy by building its non-existent shipping industry. It just wouldn't work. This shows that just because a practice is successful in one country, it will not always be successful in another. Another potential problem with getting involved in any potential human rights violation is that you can be expected to do so