In this era of globalization, news is no longer just a means of communication, but has also turned into a tool for change. Prominent journalists such as Julian Assange, Nick Davies, Sir Charles Wheeler and many others have changed the landscape and outcomes of information, war and news itself. But Martin Bell has challenged the fundamentals of journalism that it must be balanced and impartial with what he calls "attachment journalism". He also coined the phrase "bystander journalism" to continue the tradition of being distant and detached (Bell 1997), which he criticizes "for focusing on the circumstances of violence, such as military formations, weapons, strategies, maneuvers, and tactics" (Gilboa 2009, p. 99). Therefore the purpose of this essay is to explain whether it is ethical for journalists to practice what Martin Bell calls attachment journalism, evaluating its main points and counterarguments, and evaluating other notions of journalism such as peace journalism. what Martin Bell believed, it is essential to understand what his point of view is. Martin Bell is a former war reporter, prominent throughout the British news network and has reported on countless wars, one in which he was even injured while reporting on the Sarajevo War. During his years of service he always followed the traditional view of journalism, or what he called spectator journalism, similar to the Neil Report written by the BBC, and is used as recommendations and guidelines for future journalists. “The Report sets out and highlights the core values ​​of BBC journalism. They are truth and accuracy, serving the public interest, impartiality and diversity of opinions, independence and responsibility...... middle of paper......one's actions or would ultimately add to constructive conflicts .In extreme situations, journalists choose the angle they can find, tick the boxes based on the importance of the news, but never take a position. According to Kempf, journalists meet certain criteria of newsworthiness and false empirical evidence, which implement propaganda and in defense of journalists “that it did not matter that the images were fake since they only showed what people already 'knew' and since they served the purpose of open the eyes of the public” (Kempf 2002, p. 60). Various examples from the war on terrorism, where journalists and reporters falsified evidence just to get more audiences, but examples like this might raise the issue, and it's as if this responsibility of attachment journalism just adds fuel to the fire and this is being Done. in the name of peace (Kempf 2002).