Topic > Gandhi, Gramsci and Garvey - 1186

Gandhi Gramsci and Garvey all created a new way of life for their respective group of followers, but the lifestyle they provided differed in that Gandhi left room for and encouraged the mix between English and English. An Indian, Garvey worked to create a divide between blacks and whites, and Gramsci, who was more concerned with the class barrier than racial segregation, argued that all men were important to society and wanted recognition for the lower classes he believed were crucial for the company. the management of a nation. In each movement, the structure and character instilled in their lives became a necessity for daily life, creating loyalty that replaced disorientation and class disorder. Mohandas Gandhi, Antonio Gramsci and Marcus Garvey were able to mobilize the masses by creating a new highly disciplined, elevated and self-determined existence, the difference between these lifestyles: the mix of their respective followers and those who opposed them. Garvey held a similar opinion to Gramsci, that his followers “contained the embryo of a socialist state” (72) and that they held the key to their own future, and that to achieve a better future they must first look at themselves with respect . Marcus Garvey fascinated African Americans in the same way that Gramsci fascinated the working class, telling them that they were the key to the nascent state. Garvey, tired of the world's mistreatment of black people, came to believe that if black people were to be respected they must first respect themselves. Garvey created the “UNIA”; in hopes of teaching his disciples that they are as proper and dignified as any white person. It invited “all Negroes who are interested in themselves, their race and future generations… af…… middle of paper… their arguments, but their great similarity was their ability to push their disciplinarians to a new style of life and convince them of its higher standards. Gandhi is perhaps even more so since he managed to convince them to give up what little they had and to follow him, feeling like kings and queens. Furthermore, Gramsci argued that the working class was the backbone of the country, managing to give them influence and confidence against the impact of the war on their standard of living. Garvey was however extraordinary and, unlike the others, in his ability to create hope, out of nowhere he was said to have "captured the imagination of the masses... the street cleaner in the subway, the elevator boy" and gave them something to be proud of. and one day maybe feel good in your own skin. Each of them succeeded because they gave their supporters something to live for and fight for.