While there are many misconceptions about coherentism for driving regress in circles, denying the assumption that justification requires the existence of an inferential chain of reasons, they argue that it should be seen as holistic in character instead. Other philosophers argued that for such a belief system to work properly, it is still necessary for the beliefs to be justified in a circulatory way, because all the individual beliefs that make up the system are related to each other in a circular way. There are many objections to the fundamental concept of coherentism, and they are: the input and isolation objection, the alternative systems objection, and the truth-connectedness objection. It is not necessary to consider these objections separately. They can be divided into two common objections to coherentism. Despite the attempt, coherentism still fails to solve the regress problem and provide an adequate answer to the regress problem