Extra credit: Third Presidential Debate The presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was one to remember and one hundred percent worth watching. Looking at the character of both of them during the debate, I believe that neither of them should be held accountable to the government and the people. Having two presidential candidates talking bad about each other instead of responding to the important topics we deal with in society is almost absurd. Watching the debate multiple times made it easier to find logical fallacies and gave me a clear understanding of what I would expect from our future president. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay That said, President Donald Trump appears to have raised more fallacies in arguments and has overused them. Immigration became a major issue during the debate against Hillary Clinton and the major problems Americans have with our president today. In the video where Trump begins talking about immigrants and immigration, he states: “Immigrants are drug dealers, rapists and more crimes are starting in the United States today.” Many people might share this opinion, but what about people who think they are benefiting today's society and making the world a better place today? Trump used a hasty generalization based on his opinion. Building the wall seemed to him to be an excellent idea that would make America a better place, and the “safety” of Americans was well protected. He used it again when he said that “African Americans and Hispanics were living in hell, which is horrible.” Personally, I am African American and my life is completely perfect. I don't wake up every day scared and full of anger. Just because some minorities can live in hell doesn't mean they all do. Another good logical fallacy that President Trump was an expert at was shifting ground instead of answering the question and staying on topic during the debate. For example, Trump started losing the tax debate, so he used ad hominem and shifted the ground to shift the topic to Hillary with the ISIS comments he made. He was so adamant about winning the tax debate that bringing unnecessary arguments into the conversation was the only solution. Even when asked why he would be a better candidate to create jobs, Trump initially started talking about the loan he gave his father to create his business, which had nothing to do with the question. After the presidential election, I once again watched the debate and Trump's statement about how politicians give Americans hope and then forget everything they said during the debate and just spend their four years in office. Many politicians make false promises to forget about all this when they win elections. Americans relate to this issue so well, and he made it seem like it affects him too, which can be considered ordinary people. Even though Donald Trump made some mistakes during the debate, that doesn't mean Americans shouldn't have hope in our new president. However, Hillary also used some important logical fallacies that may have benefited her from gaining more popular votes during the election period. . Personally, I think that ordinary people were used by her a lot during the debate and at some point it became really annoying. When they asked presidential candidates why they were a better choice.