People often tend to analyze situations and make judgments based on how they perceive them. It's not mostly about reality and feelings take center stage. In Mark Twain's A Fable, it is evident that there are many obstacles to the realities that exist, and it is possible to interpret one thing in different ways depending on the blocks that exist between the self and the mirror of the imagination. Furthermore, the truth about a particular issue can change significantly from person to person as understanding, interpretation and perception are completely different. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In A Fable, Mark Twain illustrates how a single concept has different meanings depending on the situations and characters involved. In detail, the author describes an artist who painted a beautiful picture and placed it next to a mirror to see it through the reflection. In a way, it should have doubled the distance and made it more beautiful (Twain 1). For example, in an animal farm, the animals heard the story through the pet cat and developed an interest in learning more about the painting. In animals, in fact, the concept of beauty and attractiveness was interpreted differently, and the need to ascertain the case became a necessity rather than an option. According to the cat, the painting was beautiful. Being an intelligent animal, the cat could stand aloof in front of the mirror and see the art and its charm. Even in the description, the cat was very particular about what he experienced. “It is a flat thing, wonderfully flat, charmingly flat and elegant (Twain 3).” Furthermore, he was as beautiful as the cat described him to the other animals. However, the situation changed when other animals became involved. First of all they wanted to know what made the painting beautiful and others, like the cow, couldn't even understand what the mirror entailed. In this regard, it was necessary for the animals to discover this experience through careful observation. In fact, the donkey had developed doubts about the cat's description of the scenario that the mirror was “a hole in the wall” where an animal could look into it and see the image (Twain 6-7). Suspicion about the situation grew to the point that the donkey concluded that the cat was lying. Consequently, the best solution was for the animals to visit the location and ascertain the case themselves. Unfortunately, no animal described the painting like the cat. In fact, no animal saw the photo. As Mark Twain says, the animals stood between the image and the mirror, which means that what they saw were their images. The donkey saw himself and the elephant saw his image. Likewise, the camel, the tiger and the leopard also saw only their own image. But who was wrong? It all depends on what each animal sees, which was the truth in individual capabilities. Indeed, although there was an element of falsehood in the argument due to the way the cat had told the initial story, it is justified to infer that no animal was wrong. Several moral issues emerge from this narrative. First, judgments are often personal. There is the possibility of judging an entire situation based on the outcome of one wrong observation. Second, it is essential to make comparisons for evidence. It's a shame that the animals weren't interested in knowing how the cat arrived at his answer. In fact, if they had investigated, there is a possibility that they might have seen their reasoning flawed. Third, it is possible that people become blocked from reality. The positioning