Table of ContentsWhat's Laura Ingraham's AngleEvidence for a Lack of EvidenceIngraham's MotivationLaura Ingraham reports on the economic boom following Trump's election and of its advantages for blue- employees. However, the credit does not go only to the Trump government. The results of this boom are starting to be seen, and they are not all good news. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayWhat's Laura Ingraham's AngleLaura Ingraham is a television and radio host. He is a frequent regular contributor to FOX on a few shows, including FOX and Friends, Special Report, and his own show, The Ingraham Angle. This show is a FOX show where Laura Ingraham discusses current news, especially political stories. The show aims to “cut a path through Washington chatter to speak directly to unexpected voices and real people who are affected by the news of the day” (FOX). In November 2017, Ingraham published a story titled "The good news they're not telling you" discussing the recent economic boom. The story focuses on how "America is back!" and the increase in pay and success of trade. What Ingraham Doesn't Tell You Additionally, Ingraham addresses her audience to get the message across. He's not necessarily looking for new viewers here; It wants its established audience to hear familiar information. According to Ingraham, the current administration has worked tirelessly to protect the U.S. economy after President Obama's "anemic recovery without recovery." This work secured the economy and created a boom in commercial industries. Ingraham uses a statement from Robert Lighthizer and other statistics to support her claims. Overall, he supports the current administration and criticizes the Obama administration. Proof of Lack of Evidence Ingraham does a good job of laying the groundwork for her claims, but it's not so black and white. When he makes his statements he does not cite any sources. It shows pictures of percentages without any indication of where it gets the numbers from. Furthermore, the few sources she uses come from herself. When she uses herself as a source, she demonstrates a certain level of discredit. For example, he uses his interview with Robert Lighthizer as the source for his statement. If Ingraham had used another source to back up her claims (like another interview or article outside of FOX), it could have worked in her favor. However, it is the only source he uses to defend the growth of the economy. When researching other sources, it is clear that it is not all one-sided. A PBS article states: "Economists generally acknowledge that growth has accelerated this year compared to 2016 and 2017, with most crediting last year's tax cuts in part for fueling more consumer spending. consumers and businesses. The economy is on pace to grow at a pace of 3% or faster in 2018, which would be the first time since 2005 that it has reached that level." However, reading further, this is no different than what happened during the Obama administration. In the previous administration, the economy grew 2.9% in 2015. This year, it is expected to be only 0.1% more than 2015. While it shows growth in the economy, it is not a rapid increase, as Ingraham (Rugaber) states. Additionally, Ingraham begins talking about White House cuts and the number of the first lady's employees without mentioning the future of the economy outside of workers. This causes a kind of omission, since he mentions one side of the economy without speakingof the other. What is the future of the economy? Potentially, not much. The Bloomberg article, The US Has Chosen Slow Economic Growth, shows how the United States is on track to return to the 1995 boom, but is being held back by the Federal Reserve. You are keeping the inflation rate at a constant level of 2%, but keeping it at this percentage could cause disastrous consequences in the future. It is also a form of veiled variable, without the numbers always being present. As stated in Carl Hausman's How to Think About Information: A Journalist's Guide to Critical Thinking, "Note that what is left out of a figure is at least as important as what is put in." It is important to note that the economy may not improve during this period either. We don't know with 100% certainty what is causing the boom until we look back at the story later, as many different sources may be reporting in different ways, just like Ingraham is reporting it from her perspective. “With the unemployment rate at generational lows, employers are increasingly complaining about labor shortages, combined with above-trend economic growth typically means higher wage growth and inflation are on the way rapid, the kind of conditions that lead the Fed to raise interest rates more rapidly.” we will create the 1995 boom again, but with inflation remaining stable and wages not rising, we will remain stagnant and lag behind other countries that adopt their own changes. This shows another side of Ingraham's argument; She is valid with her ideas for an economic boom, but we must keep in mind the future of that boom. Even if the boom is under control, that does not always mean that it is good for employment. In a recent Bloomberg article titled Underemployment is the new unemployment, we learn about the effects of our new economy. In Western countries like the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany, we are seeing a huge growth boom. employment. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment in August 2018 was at a low of 3.9%. This number is low, but the jobs offered are not necessarily a match for your skills. The jobs that open up don't always show the full picture, just as Ingraham doesn't show how those in these positions might be underemployed. This change from unemployed to underemployed impacts every single field. From blue collar to white collar and everything in between, someone isn't getting paid enough or isn't receiving the benefits they need for all the qualifications they may have. Ingraham's Motivation When considering all the facts presented, it is clear that Ingraham's overall goal is to make people understand her politics and accept them. In most political news shows like Ingraham's, the anchor wants his viewers to know that what they are saying is right. This is a common problem found in both left-wing and right-wing political shows. Both sides want to recruit, but they only show what is bad about the other side instead of showing an unbiased opinion. Looking more closely, it is likely to show that the current administration is better than the Obama administration. In the video, Ingraham shows the drastic change between the Obama and Trump administrations. Since Trump took office, many right-wing politicians and supporters have “come out.” In the past, Trump's statements would have been seen as something worthy of removal from office. However, his statements are harsh and without any real punishment other than disapproval on social media. Ingraham is just a small part of a long history of prejudice,.