The event in Brussels on November 24, in fact, can be considered a turning point for the further development of our country. The Partnership Agreement signed between the Republic of Armenia and the European Union gives a new direction to the HR's foreign policy, making it more meaningful and versatile. At least that's your first impression. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThese days there is a lot of talk about the document, it is discussed in various circles. There is no shortage of opinions and now I would not like to go beyond the details of the agreement. My goal is different. Let us try to analyze the prospects that will open up before our country after the signing of this document, which is of fundamental importance in the interest of the European Union. I think you agree that in the 21st century there is no altruistic motivation at the forefront of signing any intergovernmental agreement. It should be beneficial to both parties, that's an axiom. In any case, the most pleasant result for Armenia is that first of all, our state has good prospects for developing horizontal contacts with EU member states in political, economic and other spheres. I think that establishing partnership relations on such a platform will create further opportunities, first and foremost to make pro-Armenian approaches to the Artsakh issue more attractive for European countries. Personally I consider this one of the most important results. And, above all, this document concerns the improvement of the economic situation in Armenia, the promotion of human rights and the formation of civil society through legislative reforms, and the simplification of entry visas. By the way, in this regard, I have a question. Is it reserved only for Armenian citizens? And if not, are we ready to welcome the potential boom in human flows from the “new” Germans or French to Armenia? As for cooperation in other areas. Even regarding the prospects for the resulting rapid development of the Armenian economy, I would like to be very cautious. Let's not forget that most EU countries are experiencing a deep economic crisis and have serious problems in finding new consumer markets. In this case, I leave it to the reader to analyze the extent to which they will undertake initiatives aimed at developing our country's economy. Moreover, let's not talk about Ukraine, as well as the example of Moldova, as well as Georgia, which is comparable to Armenia in many parameters and, first of all, comparable in the level of economic development and priorities. Predictions that Moldovan or Georgian fruit, vegetables and wines would conquer the European market in a blitzkrieg were, to put it mildly, exaggerated. And during the last Brussels meeting in Ukraine, they clearly explained that the next three cuts, 600 million euros, will be made only after the Kiev-Brussels reforms and the fulfillment of their commitments. In this regard, it will be interesting to reread the Agreement and discover, for example, the imperative nature of the closure of the Metsamor nuclear power plant. Perhaps there is a sector in which the expectations on our part are certainly great. My point is about legal reforms. Today we see what kind of pressure liberal Europe has to exert on Armenia traditionally, to put it mildly, to adopt laws that are not compatible with the Armenian type. To think that arbitrary or improper fulfillment of these or other requirements will be an easy task will be self-deception. Our reforms will be studied under the microscope of Brussels. And now the most important thing. I do not want to give the impression that Armenia does not welcome the signing of this agreement.,.