IndexIntroductionLiterature reviewResultsHollywood in the 21st centuryKurdish filmsBrear 2015 (decision):Bashtren Xalat:Margy ruzhnamanus (the death of a journalist):CriticismConclusionReferencesIntroductionCinema has always impressed us for its simplicity in terms of understanding and its complex effect on the psyche of the audience and we are doing this research to know the effect these films have on the mind of the audience and to what extent these films contribute to the fight against terrorism and to what extent way the Kurdish cinema also contributes to fighting them and we could not do it in the future and when other works are made it would make a full rather than slight contribution, both for the financial aspect and for the psychological effect it has on viewers. The research question will probably be “what is the difference between Hollywood cinema and Kurdish cinema in their contribution to the fight against terrorism”? and this research does not study the question of how cinema has a negative effect on the masses and perhaps that will be a topic to be seen and analyzed later in another futuristic research. Humans have always dreamed of a way to extend their lives, living for longer periods, and in art they found what they were looking for. First in painting where it reached its greatest value during the Renaissance when the art of painting began to flourish before artists drew what was there or what they see in front of them, but during the Renaissance they began to go further, painting the many aspects of life or the way they would see it from their own perspective and there were 2 endings behind painting, one of which was mainly aesthetic due to the beauty of its appearance [1] according to the psychological aspect that duplicates reality in those paintings, then another invention came to light in 1888 and that was the photographic image for everyone, although it was a more advanced version of art, but a static image can show moving objects as blurry and not very clear or even difficult to understand because it needs someone with a certain vision to understand a photographic image, then later another invention came to light which was the video camera and after the Lumière brothers started shooting their films that time in 1895 which marked the birth of modern psychiatry and which was brought up by Freud and Joseph Breuer and the birth of psychoanalysis was established by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939). Freud believed that individuals could feel relief by making themselves aware of their unaware reflections and inspirations, thus achieving "understanding." The aim of analytic treatment is to release repressed feelings and encounters, i.e. to make the unconscious conscious. His Thoughts in Early Literature In the late 19th century, Freud's belief was that it was difficult to “speak graphically” about the dynamic nature of our reasoning in a good structure.” Of course, the reader would have some questions in mind, such as what is the relationship between cinema (film) in general and psychology and audience. In the last writings of this particular research we will go through all these phases one by one starting from our hypothesis that it will be "Kurdish cinema has a lower contribution in the fight against terrorism than Hollywood". Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Literature review Here we will see the topic not only from an aesthetic point of view but we will also analyze some of the Kurdish films that concern terrorism in its contents and some Hollywood films from the 70s to the 90s due to the numerous changes that occurred in cinema in these time periods. We will look into it nextsome Hollywood movies after the 9/11 incident. To better understand the history of cinema and terrorism, we were better off choosing to revisit some of the old Hollywood blockbusters related to our topic and as the great film theorist Siegfried Kracauer said that "cinema is the mirror of the prevailing society", as well as the Hollywood cinema in the 70s had little to do with reality and that of escapism which we should define as, the villains in the plots have almost absurd reasons why they commit their attacks, for example there was a film in (1974) by the name of (the talking Pelham 1-2-3) is one of the greatest examples in films where the villain was financially motivated, the gang is led by a British mercenary who threatens the peace in New York by kidnapping a subway train to execute some sort of million dollar ransom with the government. The same pattern was duplicated in these two films, also Two Minute Warning (1976) and Rollercoaster (1977), when a group of criminals threaten to attack public places (sending black messages to the government specifically with terrifying plans to endanger a mass of population. In the 1980s this model changed from escapism to something less evasive and more directed towards real terrorism, especially when America witnessed the 444-day hostage crisis (1979), and after American involvement in the war. Lebanese Civilian (1983) for example like in Delta Force (1986) in this movie the terrorists are shown in ugly ways which of course they are shown without bandages on their heads and are seen from a low angle showing the messy hairstyle and the look that it just sends the message of fear into the hearts of anyone watching, the film paints a picture of some gang members hijacking a civilian plane all the way to Lebanon to an urban jungle in Beirut, specifically, a team has been created here to defeat them, the terrorists had prepared to get where the hijackers, when they get there they kill a lot of them and take the people who were kidnapped to their homes safely, so in the 80s the films had to open their eyes to an issue as important as terrorism and the threat to the public, movies in the 90s was just like in the 70s style movies, when the jihadists or bad guys had a certain ideology, but the ideology is just a mask behind their true motivations which they are always financial and not ideological, and most of them were like a group of terrorists who come and basically take over a bank, a park or a skyscraper (public places) and take hostages, defeat all the government's attempts to rescue the hostages and then a hero comes alone and defeats a bunch of them by himself, just like in Die Hard II (1992), Red Alert (1992), Passenger 57 (1992), Speed ​​(1995), Sudden Death (1995), Die Hard III (1995), The Rock (1996), Operation Broken Arrow (1997) or Air Force One (1997) in all these films the villains had won for a short period of time then, after the hero showed up there, fortune would change for the worse as they faced their own defeat, one after another until the hero of the film alone faced the last of them and struck him down to end all evil, only these films had shown the true face of terrorism as in True Lies (1994), Executive Decision (1996) and The Siege (1999), because they had shown the jihadists real capacity and hunger for bloodshed and how far they would be willing to go to cause the greatest possible damage to achieve the vile means, for example if we examined so to speak the role of the jihadists or how they were seen in True Lies (1994) which is mainly about a group of jihadists (Crimson Jihad) who call themselves, which succeeded to deliver some nuclear weapons from one of the unionsSoviets, trying to blackmail the US government and prove that they had those weapons they actually had detonated one on a habitable island in the Florida Keys, threatening all countries alike, then team leader Trilby (Charlton Heston) asks his troops to find the group's leader Aziz and his men before planting a nuclear bomb in front of the white house in the back of a car, the role of the hero here is played by (Arnold Schwarzenegger), the character's name he is Harry Tasker of "Omega Sector", a unit that was supposed to be a covert unit that operates in the counter-expansion of terrorism. ResultsWhen there is a moment where trauma happens to someone in a movie at the cinema and we shake hands and react to it even though it doesn't happen to us because it is projected rather than happening in reality, well it was then that William James "described the tendency of visual images to evoke motor actions more than a hundred years ago, using the term ideomotor actions: “Wherever the movement follows without hesitation and immediately the notion of it in the mind, we have an ideomotor action”. The term was originally coined to describe involuntary actions during hypnosis and seances, but James pointed out that seeing something and automatically responding with an appropriate movement is one of the most common ways in which movements are caused, "the normal process without disguises." and William James himself had separated the reason behind such acts into a methodology called mirror rules and success rule the mirror rule is basically like the saying "ape say, monkey do" but it is not available only to monkeys , in reality all animals have that type of instinct that birds have, mammals have, insects also have it and obviously human beings have the characteristic of liking all other animals and the second rule is the rule of success and it was called that because human beings repeat what had worked before a certain situation like what we call simulation and that's when human beings learn like when they play chess or something it has an effect on our subconscious and we actually learned from this. The rule of success manifests itself not only in basic motor skills, but also in increasingly discrete and complex social communications. Suppose you stop at a similar bistro on your way to work each morning, and it has two lines at the counter, staffed by two regular waiters. A great biologist Richard Dawkins once said something like the human brain works by simulation in his book the selfish gene so mostly we simulate what we see in mass media like books, films, television and reflect it in our brain into something more related to us. Van Gogh did not live to see the discharge on May 6. In August 2004, the presentation of van Gogh's short film caused a stir in Muslim circles when it appeared on open Dutch television. the presentation featured a semi-exposed Muslim woman, tattooed with Quranic sections, describing how she had been forced into an arranged marriage, abused by her significant other, sexually assaulted by her uncle, and then severely rejected for adultery. On the morning of November 2, 2004, a Dutch Moroccan Muslim, Mohammed Bouyeri, shot Van Gogh from his bicycle on a busy Amsterdam street, cold-bloodedly cut the producer's throat with a bent blade, and stuck a letter in his chest with a 'another blade. Bouyeri's letter railed against "unbelieving fundamentalists" who "threatened Islam" through films as submission. Theo van Gogh's passing has to be the most striking depiction of the wayFilm producers have been implicated in the current supposed period of worldwide terror. The Dutchman's Butcher does not limit itself to showing the dangers that producers, but above all writers, continue to face by tackling the themes of psychological oppression and religion in a period of scandalous political polarization. Hollywood in the 21st century As we argued before reviewing some of the Hollywood films In the 2000s, however, Hollywood cinema has changed dramatically compared to the 1970s and 1990s, with little accuracy in depicting terrorism and, obviously, very far from in the films of the 80s and their more honest version of depicting terrorism, it has gone from framing terrorists to non-reality (escape) or even if it depicts terrorism, it mentions it in an unrealistic way, distant irrelative models from anything real, especially after the dangers of 9/11 were delineated as extraterrestrials (War of the Worlds, 2005) or people dying from infection as in (I am Legend, 2007) or then again due to rapid changes environmental as in ( The Day after Tomorrow, 2005), if there is an example of a film that deals with terrorism it is The War Within (2005), which focuses mainly on a Pakistani prisoner who has actually been captured for a crime that he does not he had committed and brutally tortured after coming out of prison his ideology had changed to a more radical one then he finds some terrorist organization that he already had in mind. The ferocious experience transforms Hassan into an extremist who seeks revenge for the bad behavior done to him. He interfaces with a fear-mongering cell that is heavily involved in organizing an assault on New York's Amazing Focal Station. Be that as it may, his logic is put under extreme weight by logical inconsistencies and conflicting feelings: the war, in which he sees himself, is fought "inside", in his own mind. Finally, The Kingdom (2007) can be considered an elective situation for the authentic War on Dread in its delineation of effective counter-terrorism as a consequence of collaboration between Western and Central-Eastern police powers. A group of FBI examiners work closely with Saudi police Colonel Al Ghazi (Ashraf Barhom) to pursue Abu Hamza, a mid-level al-Qaeda member responsible for a siege on an American compound in Saudi Arabia. Overall, the film offers an "idealistic scene of wounded Americans returning home, mission accomplished", as Jim Hoberman commented. Kurdish films While we looked at some Hollywood films that consider terrorism as an issue to be fought, we looked at some Kurdish films and decided to evaluate them based on the circumstances of the villains of the heroes, so let's start with:Brear 2015 (decision):In this film a mother has to choose between having her son beheaded or blowing up the laundry roshnbery which means (hall of enlightenment), showing two sides of the cruelty that these terrorist groups have, one is not just to make a difficult decision and choose to save her daughter and kill innocent lives or he can save innocent teenagers and not kill them on behalf of his daughter's life. In an interview with the film's director and screenwriter Wahid Kfri said about the origin of that story: “at the beginning of the story a woman of about 30 prepares to perform a musical show and then practices with her beautiful music, then a group of terrorists hear her from afar, they arrive before 1 hour of the musical show and kidnap her, they make the women choose between her daughter and the teenagers who in the eyes of those terrorists are sinners because of 2 sins celebrating Valentine's Day day and waiting for the musical show (which is haram) and mustbe irradiated. "At the beginning of the film there will be a scene where a terrorist group's car arrives and then stops at a point and it seems like they have a hostage who is the hero of our story, and then take her into a house which happens to be the base of operations of that terrorist group, then the leader of that terrorist group appears in a scene and tells one about his help to remove the hd band and he saw the leader of that group, it seems that on the mother's face looks of horror appeared as he looked at the her right and sees a tortured man next to her, the tortured man looked terribly tired and blood was pouring from his head, then the terrorist the group gives a target to the mother to blow up the roshnbery hall, the mother looks confused as if she rejected the offer just by her expression, then the terrorist group seems to have the trump card which was her daughter, the mother was given a second option and that is to behead her precious daughter in front of her, she takes the guitar on to which a bomb is attached and it seems having no other option, a terrorist group takes her to the place where they want it to be destroyed, the mother gets out of the terrorist's car heading towards the place and there she sees all these teenagers gathered and celebrating Valentine's Day and stops thinking to all these innocent lives he is about to take, remembering that he only has one choice to make between two bitter options: choosing to do nothing and losing his daughter, who is really sad, and the other to bomb the building that has everyone these poor teenagers in it there is also something horrible. Bashtren The film begins with a scene of a director in a car heading from Baghdad to Soleimani, the next scene finds him winning a best film award about the love of a once nation in Baghdad, going through his memories of that day as he stares his phone playing a video of that day, a child next to him with his mother (Baran Omer the hero of our story here) looks at the director's phone and asks to see the glass award, the director gives it to him, the mother speaks with the boy telling him to return the award to the director and apologizes to the director, then the boy hides the award in his mother's bag, a couple is in the back of the car, apparently they were husband and wife, no, it had been a long time since they were married, flirting and talking in the back of the car, then a terrorist group comes in, makes the passengers get out of the car, the terrorist group starts searching the passengers, one of them finds the prize in his mother's bag, he they take and then who seems to be the leader of the group terrorist shouts "don't you know that acting is haram" when he breaks the award in front of the director, the director seems to be upset with what happened to his award after the leader of that terrorist group told his group kill them all, the director comes forward telling the terrorists to stop and claim the prize is hers, not the mothers trying to change their closed minds, apparently nothing worked, they took away her wife who was sitting in the backseat husband, then he started to shoot all the passengers until everyone is dead or at least they think they are having killed every last one of them, after a while they leave, then the boy wakes up, he goes to his mother trying to check if he wakes up, no response from the mother, the boy then goes to where the terrorist leader he had broken the prize first, photographs part of the prize and continues down the street. After speaking with the director of the film about what exactly inspired him to create that film and what was the image he wanted to show to theaudience of terrorists, the responses were: "I was coming home from Basra after winning an award for best short film that time and we went to see if there were any plane tickets, and there weren't any, so I had to drive back, so we did and while we were on the road while the sun had yet to rise and I had the prize in my hand, that time was the At the beginning of the war against ISIS (the Islamic State) and the people crossing these roads without encountering ISIS checkpoints were lucky, the driver of the car asked me what was in my back and I told him it contained a prize, he said be a good man and throw it away, that's a reason enough to get your head cut off by these Islamic State members, don't you know that acting and directing is haram, and I told him that even if they cut off my head I would not throw that award away, because it means a lot to me, and it's not happened that this was the extraordinary part of everything, if it had happened I wouldn't be here and I wouldn't have created that scenario from the first place" And he said in particular “the first point of the film was the director who purposely went to the city Arab girl from Baghdad to claim the award for best director despite knowing that the road ahead of him is full of dangers and he could lose his life returning home, the second point was the child who saw the award and wanted it for himself then he met the terrorist group that ended up killing all the passengers he narrowly accepts the boy and even though everyone is dead and the terrorists may have thought they had won, in the end the boy survived fulfilling the hopes and dreams of the director who kindly gave him the award . Margy ruzhnamanus (the death of a journalist): a tragic story of a journalist with his wife and two children on a journey that will cost him his life searching for and investigating the car bombing in Kirkuk. At the beginning of the story there are two different scenes one of a journalist investigating an explosion that happened in Kirkuk called al-Hasera explosion and another group who were the planners and directors of that attack which killed an innocent child and others, the hero of our story at the beginning receives a phone call from his friend, then he talks about how he is very worried about that attack because a child was killed in that action, then comes another scene where his daughter of this man plays innocently with his dolls, the journalist at that moment is still investigating that vile explosion and his daughter comes in and asks her father the journalist brings her a new doll and some fabric for the current one, then the journalist prepares to go out while the children play and the mother is busy with household chores, the father comes out asking if the family wants anything else besides his doll daughters, his wife replies not only to come back to us safe and sound and as quickly as possible , then the journalist goes out with his friend saying that the government should focus on creating not only a newspaper, but a whole TV channel about hidden vile acts happening in Kurdistan, then the journalist said to his friend “let's go buy the doll for my little girl” his friend replied isn't it a little late, we can't put it off until later finally the reporter responded with “Can't my children be all I have in my life? I can't put it off for later." Then it seems that the terrorists responsible for the explosion chased the journalist and are actually persecuting him in some way, the journalist had taken his daughter's doll and headed towards the Kurdistan Journalists' Union where they find a group of people who appear are rehearsing for an act, one of them (who seems to be the leader of that group) says: “friends, you knowwhy am I telling you to work hard on this show? because a very dear friend of mine, a journalist and expert in theater shows, is passing by to see us rehearse and give us some tips, that's why we have to work hard not to embarrass ourselves in front of him", then the journalist boys ask the mother why the father has arrived late because he said he wouldn't be late with them and now everyone is worried, the mother says "ok, I'll call him in a few minutes". The journalist reaches the syndicate where his friend is waiting for him to give him advice on his play, after finishing, he went to drink some tea and the terrorist gang seems to follow him and finally find him and shoot him dead and runs away, the mother calls her journalist husband, the children stare at their mother waiting for answers but no response from the journalist, they try to call him over and over and the phone rings next to the journalist's body lying dead on the floor, a group of police officers follows the trail of the terrorist group, pursues them and eventually captures them. In an interview with the director of this film I asked what inspired him to make this film and his answer was that a friend of his, a TV host named Saman, a very famous host, used to work with him in the channel GK Tv and "was actually killed by a terrorist just because he was working with a PUK channel" was hounded until he entered a car sales area and was shot dead. Criticism In Hollywood movies we see most of the villains almost all have no depth of character because they seem to be more likable to the audience, which is something that is shared by both sides both jihadists in Hollywood movies or in Kurdistan commit atrocities, but the only difference is that in Hollywood movies the jihadists are fought hard and then they are beaten by the heroes and the Kurdish ones all had almost sad stories with almost the hero losing everything he has. got it and why are we criticizing it? And this is because, as we said before, the mirror rule and the rule of success (simulation) fall under the rule of rewards which, on the one hand, fits you, no matter how evil the jihadists seem, there is always someone who stop and do justice to them. those found in Hollywood films, while Kurdish films were skeptical about the mirror rule and the rule of success: how would the public see the jihadists? Probably like scary beings spreading chaos across the lands without anyone telling them to stop, and again the rule of success would take away the reward by scaring the public and give the exact opposite reaction needed to be taken away from the masses and that didn't fear and even so he has a fighting chance. Conclusion Cinema has always impressed us both with its simplicity in terms of understanding and its complex effect on the psyche of the audience and we are doing this research to know the effect these films have on the minds of the audience and to what extent these films contribute to the fight against terrorism and how Kurdish cinema also contributes to fighting them and we could not do that in the future and when other works are made this would make a full contribution rather than minimal, whether it is the financial aspect or the effect psychological effect it has on viewers. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The term was originally coined to describe involuntary actions during hypnosis and seances, but James pointed out that seeing something and automatically responding with an appropriate movement is one of the most common ways in which., 28.