IndexRhetorical Devices UsedTarget AudienceWorks CitedMathew Taibbi's article, "The $9 Billion Witness: Meet JPMorgan Chase's Worst Nightmare," is an intriguing and informative article about a crime of Mathew Taibbi's white collar workers. It was published in RollingStone on November 6, 2014, and offers a third-person narrative of how Alayne Fleishmann, a securities lawyer and former Chase Bank employee, acted as a whistleblower in the mega-corruption scandal involving the top brass of JP Morgan Chase Bank. executive officials. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The author provides an in-depth narrative of how white collar crime was planned and orchestrated and how senior government officials and institutions collaborated with the perpetrators to hide information from the public. Fleishmann witnessed the crime being carried out while working at the bank as a quality control manager and even wrote two letters to the bank's senior officials to inform them of the dire consequences that would ensue (Taibbi, 2014). She was willing to volunteer the information as credible evidence to ensure that the perpetrators were brought to justice. However, the Attorney General and the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) worked with Jamie Damion, the bank's CEO, to prevent Fleishmann from revealing information he had about the case. Rhetorical devices such as situational irony and metaphor were used in the article. author to convey a particular message to the audience. Mathew addresses the general public as an audience to inform them about the true story of the largest white collar crime in American history. The article illustrates many insider trading activities that occurred but were kept hidden from the public. This article aims to analyze several elements of Mathew Taibbi's news article. Rhetorical Devices UsedMathew used different rhetorical devices to convey a particular message and evoke emotions in the minds of the users. the target audience. The irony of the situation is evident in the article, as highlighted by the Attorney General, Eric Holder, the justice system and the Security Exchange Commission (SEC) who decided to help cover up the crime. These institutions were entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that justice prevailed and supervising the proper conduct of activities, but they did exactly the opposite, preventing Fleishmann from revealing crucial evidence (Taibbi, 2014). The irony of the situation is also evident when the board of directors of Chase bank increased the compensation package of a man who oversaw the largest regulatory fine ever paid, amounting to 74% to approximately $20 million (Taibbi, 2014) . The author also used a simile in the article to compare financial products to soy in processed foods. He states, “Like soy in processed foods, these synthesized financial products end up everywhere” (Taibbi). Another device used in the article is a metaphor. The author compares the loans sold by Chase Bank to rotten dog meat to highlight how bad they were. The author also uses rhetorical questions to emphasize a particular statement, as seen when he asks, “How bad were they” (Taibbi, 2014). Taibbi also used litote in the article to point out how vague and flimsy the ten-and-a-half-page "statement of facts" document released by the bank was, rather than a detailed complaint. According to the author the document was.