Disputes in the South China Sea involve both insular and maritime claims between several sovereign states. An estimated $5 trillion in global trade passes through the South China Sea, and many non-claimant states want the South China Sea to remain international waters. The disputes include the islands, reefs, shores and other features of the South China Sea, including the Spratly Islands, the Paracel Islands and various boundaries in the Gulf of Tonkin. The claimant states are interested in maintaining or acquiring rights to fishing grounds, exploration and potential exploitation of crude oil and natural gas in the seabed of various parts of the South China Sea, and strategic control of important shipping lanes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Saudi Arabia believes there is no doubt that the Chinese almost unanimously support their government's official position on the South China Sea, shown by the firestorm of social media commentary in the immediate aftermath of the award. Furthermore, China's position is also welcomed and understood. According to the Chinese government and media, nearly 100 parties from more than 60 countries have declared their support for China's position on the South China Sea issue, and Saudi Arabia is one of them. Saudi Arabia believes that most American media and think tanks have not yet understood what “China's position” means. In our opinion, China's position on the South China Sea issue can be interpreted as follows: China does not participate in the arbitration, nor accept, recognize or implement the award. China will adhere to peaceful negotiations and settlements of the South China Sea dispute. While disputes should be resolved by the parties directly concerned in accordance with the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC), China will cooperate with countries in the South China Sea. ASEAN to maintain peace and stability in this region. ad hoc) the arbitral tribunal is neither part of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) nor the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It has no jurisdiction over territorial disputes, which form the core of arbitration. The arbitration itself is flawed in procedure. Therefore, the award is not legally binding, nor does it represent international law. So the Saudi Arabian delegate would like to propose some preventative measures that could be effective in overcoming the consequences as soon as possible: Resolution measuresIt is important to first recognize the fact that the conflict in the South China Sea is very asymmetric and therefore cannot be addressed symmetrically . China is unquestionably a superpower in the region, and the Philippines, Vietnam and other claimants are just smaller states. As a result, it is impossible to expect a fair solution that treats all participants equally. Everything should be in proportion. ASEAN countries must learn to work with the regional hegemony, China, in a proportionally win-win manner. Citing international law or forcing China to accept the proposed ASEAN code of conduct is indeed unfair to this superpower. The realist school of thought would be more honest and support China's higher position in any negotiations. The only thing ASEAN nations can do, if they really want to stand together against China, is to first focus on developing the economies of individual countries and together gradually try to reduce their dependence on Chinese products, markets and aid ..