While many Americans have no information about the mission of the Peace Corps, it must be recognized that the results of its purpose in most nations are overstated and defunct . After our visit by a Peace Corps recruiter, the presentation to our class was less than positive and actually demonstrated that this flawed system of sharing peace around the world is a myth without any merit. Since genuine help is needed around the world, trying to share peace, without completed projects, has more consequences than rewards. Celebrating fifty-five years this year, the Peace Corps is out of this world and does not represent an American way of freedom for all, but it gives false hope to those who need services. It must be recognized that if the ultimate goal is peace, failure to complete projects would have the opposite effect and bring hatred towards the United States government. In this article, I would like to argue against American taxpayers paying for the Peace Corps, against inexperienced volunteers being sent overseas, and against the Peace Corps being a failure for America and the countries that host it. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Surprised and annoyed were some of the word choices that overwhelmed me during the conference, once I learned that US taxpayers continued to support the Peace Corps. Even though they continue to receive a $250 million annual budget, that's not a drop in the bucket when you consider how painfully difficult it is for the average American to survive, right here in our country. It would be even better spent if we got rid of the Peace Corp volunteers and gave this money to the professionals already present in these countries. This theory was also advanced when it was quoted by a Peace Corps executive who said, “I should acknowledge in advance the observation made by Mr. Rice that money spent on the Peace Corps could also do a lot of good if it were invested in local resources". third world organizations, and that perhaps it would go even further if it funded domestic employees instead of sending US citizens as volunteers. "(Rule 2006) This type of thinking makes sense since many volunteers go to these countries with no purpose in mind. While it seems easy to send a volunteer to a county to assist in what the Peace Corps deems important, it would be even greater if the United States would simply send financial aid to this country with the expectation of establishing intent, plan and execution with those already living there to see it completely would bring more peace between two countries and could make future relations more cordial and effective in building bridges to the future. It is for these reasons that I believe that US taxpayers should no longer fund the Peace Corp and that the government should seek other avenues to help countries that need support and services while funding the Peace Corp should be relieved of US taxpayers' responsibility, hiring young graduates is a direct insult and embarrassment to the fabric of our society. While many graduates mature in school, this replaces life experiences and being thrown into a foreign country with little to no knowledge. I believe many graduates face the challenges that can come with volunteering in a foreign country, but what kind of representation does the United States provide to address real problems and real lives in these foreign countries? Although many volunteers ownalready characteristics that will make them successful at anything, dealing with the Peace Corps and its proven failures could take a toll on any young adult who joins to serve and accomplish certain personal and professional goals to help their future. As one former Peace Corps volunteer stated, “We all have failures, yet we bury them in the folds of our past as curious gaps in our resumes and cryptic answers to direct questions. If we fail to emerge triumphant, our failures eat us up.” This is a direct result of the lack of a plan and the fact that youth volunteers are placed right in the middle of these efforts without a plan. This solution is to stop putting more effort into recruiting young college students, but to start including more American citizens mature to assist younger volunteers in providing assistance. Although the Peace Corps was founded on the recruitment of young college students, many dropped out and returned home for various reasons but, as one Peace Corps regional director stated, "Indeed, many volunteers, especially those fresh out of college, leave before their two-year commitment.” he is tall. Lack of maturity probably contributes to this in many cases because two years is an incredibly long time for a 22 year old, but so is the feeling that they are trying to chop up a mountain with a nail file. One of the more brutal realizations that comes to mind for many PC volunteers, from what I've heard, is that their work in the country probably won't make much difference in the grand scheme of things. There is nothing that makes a person pack up faster than feeling worthless.” (Hotfelder 2008). Because this is important information, it confirms that if the Peace Corps achieves its goal of having mature volunteers serve, the vast majority will remain recent graduates. Too often these young volunteers lack the maturity and professional experience needed to be effective in the 21st century. It is with these reasons that the Peace Corps should reconsider its recruitment plan and include more mature people who volunteer to succeed in host countries. Since American taxpayers should not be responsible for funding the Peace Corps and a comprehensive review should accompany recruitment, the most important thing is whether the Peace Corps is actually a failure for America and the countries they host? As one political activist stated, “Before the creation of AmeriCorps, the Peace Corps was considered Washington's most arrogant and overrated government program.” (Bovard 2011). While the founders of the Peace Corps emphasized university volunteers as a virtue, this proved to be a recipe for disaster. Because government leaders were frustrated with the ineffectiveness of U.S. foreign aid to developing countries, they thought that tailoring aid through peace sharing would somehow make it effective. As Robert E. White, Latin regional director of the Peace Corps, stated in 1970: “It was like dropping a parachute. A volunteer would be told, “Here's the bust for you. Go look around and come down where you think you can do some good.” (Bovard 2011) This is important because there was no plan from the US government or specifically the Peace Corps. It is also interesting to note that, while our government does not have a plan, other countries were having problems with Peace Corps volunteers in their country, as stated by a Honduran representative in 1968: “The volunteer appears to be someone who has no nothing to do; his abilities are not used and.