Lee et.al's article studies how children see themselves and others, children's intra- and interracial friendships, ways in which these friendships play out in their school life. Throughout the study, Lee and colleagues said they cite race rather than ethnicity, and race continues to be the most distinguishable element in public discourse on diversity issues. He describes the studio as “Microcosm of a Singapore community”. Lee and colleagues find that for mixed-race friendships, the most common reasons for friend selection for students were common play activities, personal affinity, and acceptance, not race. Because the students shared “…the same personality with me, so we don't argue easily.” Older children were able to express thoughtful reasons, placing values ​​on mutual understanding, compatibility, shared interest and trust. Race doesn't seem to weigh that much. This is consistent with the conference videos “Race as in racing cars” and “Tan Hong Ming”, which tell us that children do not have a strong concept of race. As suggested during the lesson, it is not because children are color blind, but because they are not taught the implications of race. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In contrast, Lee and others observe the birds of a feather phenomenon. His findings showed that students of the same race participate more in certain activities. For example, Malay and Indian boys predominantly play football, while Chinese boys play badminton and basketball. Furthermore, Lee et al. they also find that speaking in the native language during informal interactions reinforces same-race grouping and sometimes excludes others. This refers to Chua Mui Hoong's article which states that race has always been a sensitive issue, because what unites a social group can also divide. Even though science has disproved our popular belief about race, and in Andy Ho's article stating that humans are 99% genetically similar, the way we perceive ourselves is still based on skin color . In Lee et al., students who were darker skin color were alienated from peers and branded with nicknames such as “Black Coffee,” “Belachan,” “Blackie.” Even Lee et al's researchers admitted to inferring each child's race from stereotypical physical characteristics such as skin color and facial features, and concluded that skin color remains the most visible discriminator in defining others. This shows that our perception of race is still surface level. Additionally, the conference supporting document provided clear definitions of race and ethnicity. Ethnicity is a conscious group of people, closely linked, by shared experiences. In the lecture, further explanation was given on the difference between Singapore Malays and other Malay cultures around the world. It is not formed in isolation, but among other cultures. Lee and colleagues' findings are consistent as they noted that “local children distinguished between Singaporeans and others. " Next, they define children by countries, such as "Chinese boy", but they did not say the same for Singapore Chinese. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essayThis clearly demonstrates the difference between race and ethnicity because what a Chinese Singaporean experiences with the nation's history is different from a Chinese Indonesian or Chinese Chinese Even though they are part of the Chinese race, too.