The transition from traditional to current methods in the treatment of diseases has improved the quality of many services, products and processes. However, many regions around the world are still applying traditional medicines (Stefanov et al., 2020). Therefore, conventional Western medicine and alternative Eastern medicine are two recognized approaches for treating multiple diseases. Researchers developed key differences between these two approaches that helped establish the pros and cons of each. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. There has been debate about which approach is most economical in terms of treatment time and cost. Furthermore, there is ongoing concern about which approach is safer than the other. The debate over which approach is superior to the other, each of which has proven practical, requires research to fill these gaps. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Western medicine focuses on the causative agents of disease and attempts to remedy the symptoms. Therefore, the anomaly creates a gap between an individual's personality and his environment (Stefanov et al., 2020). As a result, when someone is sick, their personality is not the real one they should show when they are in a healthy state. Alternative medicine, on the other hand, treats the body as the balance that is achieved through the interrelationships between the person's body and the environment (Ozioma et al., 2019). From this point of view, the cause of disease is the imbalance that occurs between the body and the environment. Therefore, the goal of alternative medicine is to treat the patient's entire system instead of cleaning the elements of the body (Stefanov et al., 2020). Therefore, critics argue that alternative medicine has better outcomes than Western medicine when it comes to the individual goals that each achieves. Alternative medicine that focuses on treating the entire system appears to be a more practical approach since it focuses on treating the entire body. The two approaches differ in the cost and time required for treatments. Alternative medicine assumes that a person exhibits lifelong health that can sustain the body, while Western medicine relies primarily on surgery and medications to maintain health. Therefore, alternative medicine focuses on supporting the body through a daily routine, proper nutrition, mental exercises, good body maintenance, and so on (Ozioma et al., 2019). Conventional Western medicine that relies on drugs and surgery appears to be more suitable for treating critical conditions, but is not the best solution for addressing chronic diseases (Grossman et al., 2018). Furthermore, it is more expensive than the alternative medicine procedure. Alternative medicine minimizes overdependence on medications. Therefore, it is economical. It is also more cost-effective and ensures stable results that offer consistent approaches to address a given health problem, especially chronic diseases (Stefanov et al., 2020). The patient can check the progress in using alternative medicine, thus adapting the conditions that may impact his health. The main advantage of alternative medicine is that it takes time to monitor the healing process; therefore, it is no longer appropriate when the patient desires rapid recovery. The treatment method used by each approach has advantages and disadvantages. Alternative medicine is based on natural components, while Western medicine is based on, 26(2), 38-44.