Introduction: It is a widely debated topic whether women should be allowed to fight or not. Throughout history, we have seen men fight in wars and some argue that things should stay that way. The question is: why? There are various biological factors that come into play. First, men were genetically designed to be more expendable than women. Men have higher bone density, greater muscle mass, and much higher testosterone levels than women. This is due to their role in protecting pregnant women, and the female body, in turn, has adapted to be the best caretaker, as evidenced by higher body fat percentages and different pelvis sizes. These adaptations are primarily for childbirth and do not contribute to a woman's ability to perform well in combat. Thesis Statement: This is why some argue that women should not be allowed in combat, which will be discussed further in this essay. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Topic Sentence: To continue with the concept of biological testing for women who do not fight in the military, we should look more deeply into what they should be allowed to do. To fill the modern military, it has been shown that men and women they are pretty much the same when it comes to aeronautical understanding and skill, so surely they should be allowed to continue in that field. Evidence and quotes: Nurses, while this doesn't need much explanation, women are naturally better caregivers and are actually quite attracted to nursing jobs, which also has a biological explanation for this, as women are attracted to jobs than helping people, which is why the middle field of nurses is predominantly female, as can be found from the work in which it is mentioned. “There are about 10 times more women in the nursing field.” Furthermore, with this women should also be able to fight in the ground troops, except in dire need of manpower, such as the IRA and/or the Soviet Army; however, the Soviets simply rushed the enemy through the average citizen, for no real tactical reason, so take them with a grain of salt. To continue, we should consider the pros and cons of having women in the army, these are from a respected military general of the Russian army Nikolai Pankov, this is a summary of his words on this topic. Topic sentence: For women and men, compulsory military service is currently a heated debate, and it is no secret that in some countries of the world, compulsory military service for women is already a reality. Evidence and quotes: The most famous country is Israel. Here, approximately 90% of all military specialties are available to women. Single women between the ages of 18 and 24 are eligible. Additionally, girls from religious families or students at religious schools may be exempt from compulsory conscription. The length of service for Israeli women is shorter than that of men and is 24 months. Mandatory service in the army and for women of North Korea. Here the “fair sex”, as it is called in this context in the EU and Asian countries, serves in special units separately from men for up to seven years, having said this it is obvious that the DPRK is considered one of the most militarized countries in the world. In free Europe, there is also a country where military service for women is mandatory, Norway. In the2014 became the only European country with a mandatory appeal for women. The service life for them is expected to be 19 months. Moreover, during the four years of “female appeal”, experts noticed that women gradually became accustomed to the fairer sex, and the presence of women even disciplines soldiers. As for Russia, as long as military service will be available to girls only on contract. At the same time, judging by polls, there is no consensus on this issue in our society. But, perhaps, the position of the military expert retired colonel Anatoly Matviychuk, which he shared in his conversation with Tsargrad, is quite sensible. To conclude a quote from Mr. Pankov: “My personal opinion as men is that for us it is a shame that women go to serve in the army. It must serve men. But now the democratic situation is such that women replace men in military service. I think combat posts should remain for men, and logistics and support posts for women. But some pros and cons of servicewomen are: There are servicewomen who have demonstrated that they are physically, mentally and morally capable of leading and executing combat operations; as a result, some of these Marines may feel qualified for the chance to take on the role. Topic sentence: Ultimately, the main concern is not whether women are capable of conducting combat operations, as we have already demonstrated that we can hold our own in some very difficult combat situations; instead, the main concern is a question of longevity. Evidence and Citations: Can women withstand the physical and physiological rigors of prolonged combat operations, and are we willing to accept the attrition and medical problems that accompany integration? – Captain Katie Petronio, United States Marine Corps, served in combat in Afghanistan and Iraq. Comment: While most jobs in the military are open equally to men and women, there are some for which women are simply not physically suited. Fitness standards were set to suit men, and women who attempt to reach them will overstretch themselves. Additionally, combat units engage in activities designed to match the capabilities of the men. As a result, women serving in integrated units will experience higher injury rates. To continue, some women will be able to meet the required standards, but most will not. While integrating women into combat is possible for those who qualify, the small number compared to the additional logistical, regulatory, and disciplinary costs associated with integration does not make it a worthwhile move. Furthermore, having women serving in direct combat will hinder mission effectiveness by damaging morale and unit cohesion. Pregnancy can affect a unit's deployability when the unit has a disproportionate number of women or is understaffed. Men, especially those who might enlist, maintain traditional gender roles. In some situations, men may act foolishly to protect women in their combat units. Topic sentence: Harassment and resentment over the presence of women in a hypermasculine military subculture would likely become a problem. Evidence and quotes: Both male and female prisoners are at risk of torture and rape, but misogynistic societies may be more willing to abuse female prisoners. Comment: Both men and women are given the opportunity to join the military, but with the understanding that different rolesthey require different physical and emotional attributes. This should in turn mean that there are multiple promotion paths so that women have equal opportunities without having to fight to take part in combat operations. Now let's talk about some women professionals who serve in the military. Topic Sentence: As long as a candidate is qualified for a position, their gender is arbitrary. It's easy to recruit and deploy women who are fitter than many men sent into combat. Recruitment and training standards for women can be calibrated. Additional pre-workout for muscle development can also be used to reduce injury rates in women. In today's high-tech battlefields, technical expertise and decision-making skills are always more valuable than simple brute force. Allowing a mixed-gender force arguably keeps the military strong. All-volunteer forces are severely troubled by declining retention and recruitment rates. Expanding the candidate pool for all jobs ensures more available recruits. Women, who choose to become active combat soldiers, are unlikely to shirk their duty by becoming pregnant after a call to arms as these women voluntarily joined the military. The general restriction on women limits the ability of commanders in theater to choose the most capable person for the job. Training will be needed to facilitate the integration of women into combat units. Cultures change over time and the male subculture can evolve as well. Many previously male-dominated professions have been successfully opened to women in the last century. Evidence and Citations: Furthermore, in the modern world of combat (Afghanistan, Iraq), all women serving in the military are exposed to “frontline risks.” Comment: Support for women serving in the military has not wavered as warfare has changed, a clear sign that the need for women to serve in combat is recognized. Topic sentence: In some circumstances women are more effective than men. Allowing women to serve doubles the talent pool for delicate and sensitive jobs that require interpersonal skills, which not all soldiers possess. Having a larger personnel base allows armies to have the best and most diplomatic soldiers working to quickly end the conflict. Since combat service is usually considered necessary for promotion to senior officer positions, denying female personnel this experience ensures that very few will reach the highest levels of the military and thus further entrenches sexism. Women must have the same opportunities as men, in the army to have the same opportunities they must be exposed to the same risks. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Concluding Paragraph: In conclusion, although there are some benefits to having women in the military, which are mostly social benefits, women should stay away from the front lines as there are many ways it could be significantly worse for a woman: abuse (by the enemy if captured), sexual tension between men and women, and lack of physical capabilities compared to a man, to name a few. Instead, women should serve in less physically tough fields, such as pilots, control centers and nurses, to name just a few. This way they can serve the country in a way that doesn't put themselves or others at risk. Sources:.