Have you ever doubted how much knowledge people should have to have confidence in themselves? I always ask myself these types of questions. I always doubt my knowledge, my self-confidence and all the things I have learned in my life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay“We know for sure only when we know little; with knowledge doubt increases.” This is a quote adapted from JW von Goethe. But what does JW von Goethe want to communicate with the words trust and doubt? The title above identifies a correlation between two key terms for the interpretation of knowledge. A corresponding link is established between trust and doubt. To provide an explanation to the statement I will define these two terms. What is trust? What is doubt? On the one hand, the word trust has been defined as: “The state of feeling certain of the truth of something.” Speaking of confidence, “it can be described as the belief in one's ability to succeed. In the purest sense, confidence expresses the knowledge you put into doing a certain thing and more specifically into what you are good at. On the other hand, doubt is “A feeling of uncertainty or lack of conviction.” As we can read from the definition in the Oxford dictionary, it is clearly visible how those two nouns are the opposite of a very specific feeling. In life, as in school, we always tend to think about our knowledge. “The concept of doubt as a suspension between two contradictory propositions covers a range of phenomena at the mental level, involving the reasoned examination of facts and evidence, and at the emotional level the belief in disbelief. Branches of philosophy devote much effort to distinguishing the doubtful, the probable, and the certain. “Everyone is attracted by confidence and repelled by doubt, and this can be seen in every aspect of life, be it personal, professional or political. Talking about confidence doesn't mean doubt doesn't exist, it means we can develop confidence to be the stronger of the two. One thing I have learned in my life is that we don't live confident or doubtful, we live our lives as both. The title addresses and contests the mutual relationship between doubt and trust. It is possible to approach the title by investigating its reliability with respect to two areas of knowledge: ethics and the human sciences. I decided to delve into these two Areas of Knowledge because after reading the title several times, to understand it better, I realized the importance of these two in relation to doubts and trust. Ethics will give me the opportunity to consider the role of philosophy in today's knowledge. On the other hand, I will investigate the role and appearance of dictatorship. The first question that comes to mind when I read JW von Goethe's quote is “how do we know when we know little?” Socrates once said, “I know that I know nothing,” this caption is one of the most famous of all time about knowledge. Socrates was and still is one of the most brilliant and important philosophers. He is known as the first moral philosopher and also the founder of Western philosophy. The quote I mentioned earlier confirms that people usually have more self-confidence when they know little. “The phrase itself comes from Plato's account of Socrates. In the Apology, a Socratic dialogue, Plato says that Socrates explains the fact that he seems wiser than any other person because he does not imagine he knows what he does not know. «It therefore seems to me, at least in this small detail, that I am wiser than this man, that is, what I don't know I don't think I know either.» Analyzing the phrase that Socrates tries to express in a modern perspective, when we think about how much we know, this is usually determined by how much we know aboutdon't know. An example is ignorant people, who tend to think that what they know is all they need to know, so it seems like they know everything. Looking at it from another perspective, when people understand how much there is to know that they don't know, then what they do know seems very little in contrast. Personally I think what Socrates is trying to express is that no one really knows how much knowledge they have, however little. On the other hand, a question I asked myself was “how is it possible that one of the most intelligent beings” philosopher of all time knows nothing?” Socrates was known for his intelligence, knowledge and intelligence. His quotes have always been used in life, especially at school to make people understand that even the most intelligent philosopher of all time cannot know anything. I believe that knowledge is a powerful tool that we sometimes underestimate, but on the other hand I firmly believe that life in all its aspects is just as beautiful due to the lack of knowledge we have. Because of doubts we cannot resolve and questions we cannot answer. I believe that a life with full knowledge of everything would not be healthy. Personally I think what Socrates and in this case the Ethics want to explain is that “No one actually knows anything, but I actually know this thing, therefore I know something”. In life, no matter how much knowledge an individual is able to acquire, that knowledge is still a mere drop in the ocean of available knowledge. Unlike ethics, in the human sciences knowledge is acquired through quantitative and qualitative data. It is therefore based on the variability of theories that interpret the non-spontaneous prediction of behaviors and behavioral choices. The second area of ​​knowledge that I decided to analyze is the human sciences. “To what extent are the human sciences reliable?” “What constitutes good confidence and knowledge in the humanities?” The definition of humanities from the Oxford dictionary is: “A branch of study concerned with people and their actions, including the social sciences and humanities, as opposed to the natural sciences or physical sciences.” By analyzing all the different aspects of this area of ​​knowledge, I decided to investigate how the role of politics and therefore global politics is related, linked, to knowledge. A fundamental topic for the history and politics of any country is the role of dictatorship. “Dictatorship, a form of government in which one person or small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations.” "To what extent can a government have an impact on citizens' trust?" Looking at the role and function on citizens under the dictatorship, it is possible to see how people react when they know with confidence and when they have doubts about something. In July 2015, the last round of elections achieved almost 100% voter turnout. Despite their desire and desire to be democratic people, they have been classified as one of the most authoritarian and least democratic. North Korea is known as a totalitarian state, run by a dynastic line of dictators. Since North Korea publicly executes its citizens for any anti-state actions, this is not a good idea. When voters decide to vote against the recommended candidate, this is expressed as disloyalty and a criminal act. While North Koreans may want to end countless human rights abuses, mass incarcerations, and widespread famine, there is no political way to do so. The North Korean government system is also considered insane due to the cult of personality that surrounds its citizens. Kim family. In other words, the role and more specifically the function of dictatorship, in Korea as in other places.