“Woe to the statesman whose arguments for going to war are not as convincing in the end as they were in the beginning,” is a quote from the famous secretary of state Henry Kissinger. Conflicts involving war and world order play an important role in the current global context. World order refers to global circumstances, influenced by world powers, and the system of controlling global events, generally through established international agreements, necessary to preserve global political stability. In recent years, high levels of interdependence resulting from globalization have increased the need for a world order. There are two noteworthy types of conflicts that pose a threat to world maintenance in our 21st century world; interstate and intrastate clashes. Interstate clashes refer, for example, to regular warfare, atomic and digital warfare, with a contemporary case of interstate clash in the South China Sea; and intrastate conflict, which alludes to conflicts such as civil war, guerrilla warfare, coups, fearmongering, and massacres. A further contemporary case of intrastate conflict is the Syrian conflict. Several reasons cause difficulties in maintaining the World Order, including cultural attitudes; causing the recent wave of terrorist attacks against the global community, territorial aspirations; as in the South China Sea and aspirations for power. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay So why do we need world order? There are several key reasons why we must maintain an effective world order, both to prevent negative repercussions and to encourage positive repercussions. First, and most importantly, global destruction could occur due to world conflict due to failure to maintain World Order; this could be as a means of nuclear or other warfare, furthermore, global issues such as warming may not be adequately addressed and thus lead to the destruction of our globe, globalization and a sense of mutualism. World order is also extremely important and depends on the recognition of the economic and social benefits arising from interdependence, and therefore states strive towards cooperation which leads to exponential growth of international law with a higher degree of compliance. With the increasing dependence on the maintenance of world order recognized by the world's superpowers, many legal measures have been implemented in direct response to events such as the South China Sea and terrorism, but also in a broader acceptance of the need for maintenance. Nations formed in 1945 and affectionately called the United Nations; it is the pinnacle of international law and responsible for the unanimous protection of the World Order. Its primary objective is to provide concrete guidelines on how peace can be achieved and maintained. Kofi Annan states that “The effectiveness of the United Nations is based on high-level political support and partnerships between governments” and this further reflects the importance of the world order. However, the UN, like many legal responses to threats to the world order, has its shortcomings, as it does not have an international body to ensure its enforcement if states do not ratify the proposed laws. Such as UNCLOS relating to the South China Sea. The interstate conflict related to the disruption of the world order in the South China Sea is significant and extensive; but why did a conflict arise in the region? The South China Sea (SCS) plays a roleimportant in the geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific, bordering Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and, in particular, Vietnam and China. This broad selection of industrial capital means that SCS contributes significantly as a commercial gateway to global merchant shipping. This consolidates its relevance as an important economic and strategic subregion of the Indo-Pacific. The point at which the disruption of the world order occurs is the competition of sovereignty of small islands and features. Creating a long-standing source of tension and mistrust. The first act of aggression came from China, without any surprise to anyone. This occurred in January 1974; when he forced South Vietnam to leave the Crescent Islands. In March 1988, the Chinese navy made contact with the Vietnamese navy, resulting in the Chinese occupation of seven islands in the Spratlys, and is also asserting greater control over distant waters that had previously been considered international. The result of Chinese aggression in the SCS was the dredging of several islands across the Spratlys, the dredging by the Chinese accumulated silt on top of the reefs, raising them above sea level to allow the creation of an airport of around 3,000 meters in length. This airport would serve as a base point for the Chinese air force which, with the support of the coast guard, would be able to threaten Vietnam and intimidate the Philippines. Various legal measures with varying degrees of effectiveness have been implemented to suppress aggression in the SCS; with the main legal measure including the intervention of the United Nations (UN). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was a treaty proposed by the Security Council and entered into force in 1994. It establishes the legal framework, which is intended to balance the interests of coastal states with those of maritime states; both from an economic and safety point of view. “UNCLOS establishes the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), a 200 nautical mile area that extends exclusive rights to exploit marine resources to coastal nations. However, the EEZ was never intended to serve as a security zone, and UNCLOS also guarantees broad rights of passage for naval vessels and military aircraft.” declared by the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It creates an interdependence of nations with obligations covering all marine areas and activities. UNCLOS is rather ineffective as a UN measure to prevent disruption of the world order in the SCS region, as it relies on universal acceptance like all UN bills and treaties. Although the language of the Convention appears to require both parties and non-parties to the Convention, the Convention does not automatically generate privileges or liabilities for third party members under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Although most of the Convention is currently enforceable as customary international law, the lack of full and universal acceptance of the Convention will leave the legal order intended by UNCLOS without its full effect, thus leaving the Convention institutions powerless. Other legal measures have indeed been implemented in the region to prevent the disruption of the world order, but they have been quite insignificant and therefore ineffective in preventing tensions from erupting in the region. One intervention, however, involves the involvement of the United States Navy, to patrol the waters considered international territory and support mediation efforts. While these efforts have been effective in limiting the current outbreak of conflict, they are ineffective due to the limitations of.