The current prison and prison system have two main functions for the treatment of crime, deterrence and rehabilitation. As a deterrent, the aim is to scare prisoners into committing crimes by giving them a punishment, such as imprisonment, to reduce the chances of criminals committing a crime again. Rehabilitation is like a moral reform for criminals, which should change prisoners' mentality and attitude towards crime, so that future crimes or recidivism can be prevented in this way. These two methods will not completely solve the problem of recidivism or crime prevention. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Much research has indicated that rehabilitation does not really work in terms of reducing recidivism (Smith 2007). From Sutherland's point of view, he could state that rehabilitation will not work perfectly because people committing crimes are not because of their "psychopathic and sociopathic conditions of poverty" (Sutherland 2), but there are many other factors that contribute to this . Indeed, cases such as commission sharing cannot be explained with such understanding. Environmental stimuli can also play an important role in causing crime, such as social disorganization. Furthermore, prison is often not that effective as a deterrent. Some people may become accustomed to this type of deterrence and be immune to it. At this point, for them, prison is no longer a deterrent. Although the prison system tries to function as a method of deterrence and rehabilitation, mainly focused on changing people's minds and attitudes, it still cannot prevent environmental or social factors that could influence people to break laws in the future. Sutherland emphasized the importance of environmental and social factors, as described in the textbook, as “differential association.” This theory indicates that it is not innate for someone to be a criminal, but is largely dependent on the environment in which they can learn to commit a crime (Ritzer and Murphy 154). Sutherland might suggest shifting the main focus of criminology not only to creating a “perfect” prison system, but also to preventing the occurrence of social disorganization so that overall social stability can be achieved. To prevent social disorganization it is necessary to pay equal attention to all types of crimes. White-collar crime has been overlooked by today's society, which usually receives much less attention than lower-class crime. However, you need to pay attention to both types of crimes, because they can all cause social disorganization, in different ways. Criminology aims to focus on the criminal justice system (Ritzer and Murphy 156), but I don't think Sutherland will. support the current prison system, because, first, the United States is now facing serious economic problems due to the increasing number of people convicted, which has effectively reduced the effectiveness of the prison system through problems such as overcrowding ( Ritzer and Murphy 156). Not only does it make prison less effective, but it also raises more problems through the “criminogenic” effect (Ritzer and Murphy 158). The "criminogenic" effect will make the situation worse by providing prisoners with an environment that keeps them criminals or worse. The environment matters, it's what Sutherland values, so these issues of the prison system should be concerned. Secondly, although the 156)..