Topic > Research How Hamlet Destroyed Himself

Alone in his childhood home, his father buried and his mother married to another man, Hamlet laments, "Oh, would this too foul flesh melt, melt and would resolve itself into dew" (1.2.129-30). Hamlet talks about suicide at the beginning of Act I and reflects on it throughout the play. He not only considers the idea, but intentionally courts death while carrying out his father's revenge. The prince allows himself to be killed because he can no longer bear to live, but neither can he take his own life in good conscience. Hamlet's suicidal intent is a simple explanation for his puzzling behavior and confused speech; his intelligence, sensitivity and religion, however, push him to seek liberation from the pains of his world in an honorable way. Hamlet's death was a suicide; the entire action of the play leads to its carefully orchestrated and impeccably acted massacre. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay On his first appearance Gertrude describes Hamlet as a "knight-coloured" man with "veiled lids", claims to be even more sorrowfully struck, as having "downcast countenance of countenance, fruitful river of eye" (1.2 .81-3). The melancholy and discontent in Hamlet's life determine the direction of all his thoughts and actions, even possibly towards suicide. His first soliloquy explores the idea, and his frustrated tendencies in that direction, "that the LORD had not set his canon 'against self-murder" (1.2.131-32). Shakespeare wanted Hamlet to appear to the audience as a "truly sorrowful melancholic" from the first curtain (McCullen). Horatio is well aware of Hamlet's fragile condition, and when he confronts the ghost he fears that the apparition may be too much for his oversensitive prince and "drive him to madness" (1.4.74-5). Hamlet faces a massive series of family hardships that affect the hero's life and reason. He returns home after his father's sudden death to find his mother in the bed of another man, his father's killer; his throne is taken from him, yet he is not allowed to return to school; his friends have betrayed him, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, like Polonius, allow themselves to be manipulated by Claudius and sneak into the castle, and his beloved Ophelia becomes an obedient tool to be used by his enemies. This leaves Hamlet completely alone. Hamlet wants to end his life, but he must be faithful to the spirit of his father, as well as his Christian ideals. He is torn between wanting to end his own life and being faithful to his father's spirit and his Christian ideals. To avenge his father's murder Hamlet must kill his uncle, an idea that is so at odds with his humanity and faith. who in the fifth act continues to question Horace about the justice of killing Claudius even after seeing the king's deadly intentions towards himself and having demonstrated the king's guilt with a play. Hamlet just fails to commit blood feud, despite his assurances to the ghost and occasionally to himself and Horatio. Hamlet is caught in a double bind; if on the one hand revenge will bring tranquility to the ghost of his father, on the other it will also destroy any hope of salvation for Hamlet's soul (Nardo). His father's lack of absolution upon his death deeply troubled Hamlet. Shakespeare surely intended for Hamlet's deeply held religious values ​​to prevent him from ending the life of his uncle or himself. Hamlet is stuck in a situation from which he cannot avoid damaging his deepest principles. Is it any wonder that he would rather die than choose one of thepaths that were left for him on earth? Hamlet discusses this within himself in his famous question "To be or not to be?" a question that has three answers and not just two, and which according to Professor Hardin Craig constitutes "the crucial step in the interpretation of the character of Hamlet" (McCullen). The soliloquy revisits the topic from his first soliloquy. The underlying theme is clearly Hamlet's concern with death, but is his emphasis on his own end or that of Claudius? The argument is easy to apply to Hamlet. Taking his own life would damage his soul and lead him to unknown and perhaps horrible places, while living means enduring "outrageous fortune" and resisting said "slings and arrows" can only mean killing Claudius, which would damage Hamlet's soul as well as possibly ending his life (McCullen). Or Hamlet could do nothing, the third option and an unacceptable choice for a hero and a prince. He regrets his very existence which requires him to make up for what was done to his father, but he cannot take his own life until his duty is done. Hamlet will avenge his father, but he seems equally devoted to putting himself in danger and securing an honorable death for himself as he is to ensuring that Claudius meets his end. From his first exchange with the King all we see of Hamlet is inappropriate derision, insults and contempt. Hamlet's very first direct address to Claudius is "I am too much in the sun", meaning that he does not want the "sun" to be in royal favor, as well as being a pun on son since he is Hamlet's son and how such should be on the throne of his father (Nardo). Hamlet barely speaks a civil word to the king throughout the play; he never misses a single opportunity to let his uncle know about his ambitions for the throne and his dislike for marriage. Hamlet's presentation of the Murder of Gonzago was also a senseless stunt, he has already accepted that the ghost is not a fiction, he does not need further evidence to kill Claudius, and there was no need to make the parallel drama of the murder so close to the real event Claudio would have shown himself guilty in any case. Hamlet makes every effort to convince Claudius and the court of his homicidal mania and contempt for their unholy situation, a purpose exactly contrary to self-preservation (Nardo). Hamlet is trying to get himself killed. Hamlet puts himself in grave danger when he travels, not against his will, to England with his two school friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern who he knows are Claudius' spies and states "I will trust as I will trust the fangs of vipers". d" (3.4.203). He obviously expects them to harm him and yet makes no plan against the danger as he goes out to become a friendless victim at sea. Nor does Hamlet later tell Horatio that he intentionally made an effort to investigate the "warrant" sent to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. It was a whim, a "recklessness" that led Hamlet to discover the letter ordering his death and only luck in the arrival of the pirate ship that allowed him to do so. to return home safely. Why would Hamlet want to return home safely? If all his actions were intended to cause his own death, he would have accomplished this with an execution. it would not be good for Hamlet (Nardo). It would be an honorable death, Hamlet wants to face Claudius on level ground The final and most convincing example of Hamlet courting death is his foolish acceptance of Laertes' challenge when the prince. he is fully aware of the plot against his life by Claudius and probably also by Laertes after what Hamlet did to his family. Laertes even tried to suffocate him on Ophelia's tomb, not, 1998.