One of the most controversial scientific debates is the conflict between nature and nurture. This focuses on whether our genes control and determine the person we believe we are today, or whether our early environment shaped us into who we are. This idea has been puzzling and has been discussed by scientists for a long time. There is no right or wrong position. There is a lot of carefully researched information that proves both sides of the spectrum to be true, but could one be more accurate than the other? In this article I aim to address the many issues within the debate and connect them to modern-day problems. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay I started by reading and analyzing an article written by Kayla Guo. Family has influenced our way of life, our culture, etc. Our family is the first person we know in our life and with whom we share the most things in common. However, our family is not the only group of people that influences our daily lives. As we grow up, we are continually introduced to other groups of people with whom we may or may not begin to develop similar interests, but we will always have the strongest relationship with our parents. Guo references a psychology teacher Jenna Breuer who raises a great point. In the example Breuer uses, he says a child who plays soccer might view his soccer team as his “peer group,” or a group with which he shares one or more interests. While kids are still affected, it's only in one aspect of their lives, sports. Family, on the other hand, is with us every day of the year and constantly influences us in many aspects of life. This article does a great job of informing the educational side of the conversation, but misses the opposite side, nature. There are many other plausible explanations for why we are the way we are. First, the way our body works varies from person to person. A predominantly “right-brained” person could very well be born into a “left-brained” family. There is nothing the family could or could not have done to predict or change this, the individual was simply born with this trait. When talking about this topic it is very important to also discuss the role that our genes have on us. We humans have multiple pairs of chromosomes within our bodies that contain DNA. DNA is made up of different nucleotides that code for different genes and traits. These genes and traits of our DNA are probably responsible for making us who we are today. I also believe that our memory and its different processes can impact us as individuals. In class, we defined memory as “the retention of information over time” or “the endurance of learning.” We constantly retain information, no matter how old we are. It is obvious that no two people are the same, so it would not make sense that two people's memories are also not the same. Information that we believe is important to us will stay with us and impact who we are. The article raises some excellent points about how the people around us influence us, but it lacks an overview of all the things that make us the people we are today. After analyzing the article, I looked at some academic sources to see their opinions on nature vs. nature. fuel the debate. Something that almost all of the articles had in common was that they believed there really was no right or wrong side. Matt Bradshaw even stated: “We maintain that the.