The central argument in Euthyphro implies that the concept of "good" must be independent of the concept of "God" such that "God must love what is good because it is good" Grube argues that this implies that God has no choice in the matter. To understand this conclusion it is necessary to first evaluate how the concepts "good" and "God" can be independent of each other, since they appear to be synonymous in the sense that good is an integral element of the concept of God. This places the first problem, if accepted, however, one still has to address the problematic argument that God has no choice in the matter There must be a set of rules governing what is good, regardless of God's opinion, over which He has no control . Although this statement seems absurd, it is possible that God has no choice in deciding what is good, but must make it adhere to the rules that govern what is good. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The assumption that the concept of good is independent of the concept of God seems absurd. If "God is good" is a summary statement, then the concept of good helps characterize the concept of God. Good must be separate from God in order for it to be an attribute of God. If good and God were not independent the one from the other, the statement "God is good" would simply be equivalent to saying "God is God", which makes no sense. Most followers of God have a reason to follow what God wants. If one judges that one follows God because he is good, then it seems that good must mean something other than God for the statement to make sense and for people to follow him. The good must describe something more than “what God loves,” otherwise it would mean nothing. If good is independent of God, however, does this imply that God did not create good, and if so, who or what did? Did God create good? Perhaps God is just a manifestation of the qualities of good. Where, then, did humans get their concept of the good? While these questions remain, it would not make sense if God and good were not independent concepts. The alternative makes no sense, so the concept of God and good exist independently. This statement seems to imply that good existed before God and that He did not create it. If he has no choice in the matter and did not create good, then could there be a power greater than God, forcing him to love what is good? Having a standard of good separate from God means that good existed before God. What is the concept of God without the concept of good to define it? He could not have existed before creating good because there would have been no way to understand what God is. However, it seems impossible to imagine that he created good before existing himself. This seems to indicate that God did not create good. For a word to have meaning, there must be a consistent and inviolable rule for the use of the word. It can be assumed that God loves everything in his world. However, this does not follow a standard, so it cannot be a rule. If he wants to love what is good, however, God must conform to a concept of good. If He didn't, how would we know what God is and why we would think He is worthy of our praise and respect. If God could choose whether to love the good, He would still have to love according to a standard. Therefore, it has independent criteria of good: a set of rules. God must follow these criteria. Since the concept of good exists independently of God, the definition of good is not determined by God. Good may define God, but God does not define good. God must therefore follow criteria that are not at his discretion. He has no choice in the matter. God will not love what is good to.