Topic > What They Fought For: Slavery's Role in the Civil War

The Civil War, fought between 1861 and 1865, was a defining moment in American history. The war, which resulted in the deaths of more than 620,000 soldiers and civilians, was fought between Northern and Southern states over a variety of issues, including states' rights, economic differences, and, most notably, the issue of slavery . The role of slavery in the causes of the Civil War has been the subject of much debate and academic research. In his book What They Fought For, 1861-1865, James M. McPherson provides a detailed analysis of the role of slavery in the causes of the Civil War. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayMcPherson argues that slavery was the primary cause of the Civil War. He states, “Slavery was the root cause of the secession crisis, the trigger that set off the chain reaction of events that led to the war.” He argues that Southern states seceded from the Union primarily because of their desire to protect and expand the institution of slavery. Southern states saw slavery as a vital part of their economy and way of life and were willing to fight to preserve it. McPherson notes that Southern states had long been dissatisfied with the federal government's attempts to limit the expansion of slavery into the territories, and saw secession as a way to protect their economic interests. lifestyle and their political power. McPherson argues that Southern states believed slavery was necessary to maintain their social hierarchy, in which white plantation owners were the ruling class. He notes that "slavery was not only an economic institution, but also a social and political one." Southern states were also concerned that abolishing slavery would lead to a loss of political power, as Northern states had larger populations and more representatives in Congress. McPherson also notes that Southern states were deeply committed to the idea of ​​"states" rights. They believed that the federal government should not be able to interfere in their affairs and saw slavery as a state issue that should be left to the individual states to decide. He states, “The issue of slavery in the territories was the most important issue dividing the North and South in the 1850s.” This belief in states' rights led to a growing sense of alienation between Southern and Northern states, and ultimately led to the outbreak of war. However, McPherson also notes that the causes of the Civil War were not limited to the issue of slavery. He argues that there were other factors that contributed to the outbreak of the war, including economic differences between the Northern and Southern states and political differences between the two regions. Northern states had a more industrialized economy and were more politically progressive, while Southern states had an agrarian economy and were more conservative. He observes: "The economic and political differences between North and South were not only real, but also profound and growing." These differences led to a growing sense of mistrust and alienation between the two regions. McPherson also notes that the Civil War was not exclusively a war between the North and the South. He argues that there were significant divisions within the Northern and Southern states as well and that these divisions played a significant role in the outbreak of the war. For example, there were many Northern abolitionists deeply committed to the abolition of slavery and willing to fight for their beliefs. At the same time."