IndexIntroductionSummaryAnalysisConclusionIntroduction In the vast complexity of therapeutic disciplines and Health Humanities, there are various reflections that certify few disciplines that reinforce one of these is “Science, Technology, and Human Health: The Value of STS in Medical and Health Humanities Pedagogy” written by Julia Knopes four details imply. The article is enlightening and informative as the author proposes that STS can extend the basic understanding of undergraduate and graduate students so that STS offers substance and influences the experience of disorders and well-being. Say no to plagiarism - essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get the original essay Summary As shown in the article, STS is extremely helpful in considering the development of specific disciplinary viewpoints for students pursuing the Therapeutic and Health Humanities program. Furthermore, Julia Knopes' article explained the program's affiliation with science and technology studies approaches. The primary focus in which STS is believed to be valuable to the humanities includes debating effective procedures in developing medicine, evaluating the significance of innovation, how it orients students to disease, and how which is influenced by social beliefs, the measurement of the variety of biomedical epistemologies, instead of expecting biomedicine to be organized information that does not move with respect to context and criticizes the predisposition in biomedical preparation, particularly in the degrading voices of women. The theoretical relevance of the main focuses and the association of the STS to the program was evaluated at Case Western Reserve University. Furthermore, through observation of how the program can be adapted in other universities, it can examine how STS can be integrated within the program. Thus, from the arguments, Julia Knopes concluded that enrolling together in medical humanities and science and technology studies could offer fundamental means to be alert, skillful and beneficial to biomedical care. Analysis Within the article, Julia Knopes organizes well the inconspicuous components within the topics as the supporting points of interest were expressed, first from history to the applied progress of science. Regarding the previously mentioned main advantage of STS in the field of therapeutic humanities and wellness, the author stated that STS challenges the idea of ​​an orderly process in the development of science. According to the article, “medical anthropologists with STS engage in criticism of scientific progress where not all progress is positive.” This is inferred that through STS, giant strides are made in the ability of students to be comprehensive in supervising the orderly way of progression of science. Furthermore, the author also stated that biomedical treatments have eradicated innate healers. This implies that by looking at social events, students can seek further investigation into how science that influences biomedicine develops today. In the second argument, STS work argues that the advancement of design shapes and influences how we characterize and respond to disease. and, in turn, harvest untapped implications given the beliefs, practices and values ​​that encompass its application. Julia Knopes explained that adopting a fetus is considered both adopted as it may have been born biologically. This implies that considering social guidelines in STS affects how technology is associated with drugs and in..