Public transport is an important and necessary aspect of modern society. It can be defined as transport available to the public, which charges fixed fares and runs along pre-established routes. For example buses, trains, light rail, ferries, etc. It is essential to be successful when planning and developing a public transport system as, if completed correctly, this can have numerous benefits, such as environmental and financial sustainability, increased tourism revenue for all involved, increased housing values, opportunities of physical activity and a better quality of life on a holistic level. If inadequately managed, this can have detrimental effects on the region, such as lowered housing values, environmental effects, increased crime rates and anti-social behaviour. A quality public transport system is indispensable in any advanced society, and those who lack it will find themselves at a serious disadvantage. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Sustainability has been identified as a key concern for public transport planning. The goal is to create a public transport system that meets the environmental, social and economic needs of the public. In recent years the environmental impacts of public transport around the world have been widely recognized. As the transport sector depends almost exclusively on fossil fuels, in 2007 almost a quarter of all greenhouse gases were contributed to transport across Europe. The quality and effectiveness of transportation systems must be increased based on public demand, while decreasing environmental pollution. Diverting preferred transportation methods to the public system can help mitigate social and environmental problems. (Susniene 2012) Transport infrastructure plays a vital role in supporting the economy. The growth of tourism in the United States has prompted the government to commit to the development of a national high-speed rail system. It is argued that a rapid rail system would ease accessibility restrictions and improve tourism across the country. American citizens were also positive about the idea as this new rail system would ease traffic congestion and also minimize fuel consumption and parking problems. For tourists, a high-speed rail system can help intertwine various tourism products and services. However, major attractions and destinations may lose significant amounts of revenue due to the accessibility of alternative opportunities. For a project like this to be successful and profitable, tourism operators must work towards a long-term goal for sustainable benefit across the region. (Becker & George 2011) Increasing the financial sustainability of public transport will allow funds to be spent more efficiently, for example by supporting the effectiveness of the transport system rather than using private cars, which produce greater quantities of fossil fuels. In Germany, the share of operating expenses covered by paying customers increased from 59% in 1991 to 77% in 2007. To achieve financial sustainability the public transport system must be planned extensively (Buehler & Pucher 2011). However, many other professionals argue that long-term planning does not produce greater financial sustainability. It is argued that daily planning reduces and neglects long-term environmental objectives, adopting an approach more focused on economic sustainability(Hrelja 2011). The use of public transport not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also promotes physical activity in individuals. who participate. Studies show that 29% of people who walk to and from public transportation achieve the recommended daily amount of physical activity. It is argued that limiting the convenience of parking and manipulating costs, such as those of car travel and fuel, among other things, will dissuade people from using personal cars and increase the likelihood of using public transport, resulting in increased physical activity. Furthermore, it has been shown that people do not actually want minimum commuting time, and further studies reveal that half of employees want commuting time of 20 minutes or more, while only 3% want less than 2 minutes of commuting time. displacement. Workers expressed pleasure at being able to complete their daily exercise while traveling rather than assigning alternative times during the day. The opportunity to engage in physical activity when using public transport has a number of benefits for the health of society. (Merom et al. 2008) Research revealed that private vehicle users have shown a willingness to switch to using public transport if this mode of transport shows better quality and efficiency. Furthermore, it is also known that car users have underestimated the quality of their experience in using public transport and are positively surprised by their predisposition to unlikely satisfaction. This is believed to be why those who neglect the public transport system do so because their expectations of the standard are too low. This is due to the fact that most of the population has little experience and knowledge in using public transport. This is why it is important to support and publicize the need to use public transport to achieve environmental and economic sustainability. (Pedersen et al. 2011) Effective implementation of public transport can have a significant impact on tourism, which will consequently significantly affect the economy. The world's largest cities with the highest levels of tourism have government bodies that actively promote public transportation. Buses, subways and trains are essential services for tourists arriving in large cities as private transport is deemed too expensive or scarce. Tourism clearly increases the demand for public transport and, due to the strong pressure, public transport systems must be adaptable, making it an important element for urban planners (Albalate & Bel 2010). Although this is controversial as some experts believe that it is difficult to assess the impact of tourism as transport companies are unable to distinguish commuters from tourists (Becker & George 2011). Des Rosiers et al. (2010) conducted a study between 1993 and 1997, attempting to determine whether the quality of bus service in an urban area would result in high property values. Regular routes, metro buses and express routes were taken into account individually to establish the effect on house prices. The findings suggest that the increased frequency of regular bus routes has negatively affected home values. On the contrary, the increase in the frequency of express trips has positive effects on the value of homes as they have proven to be a convenient substitute for the private car. This determines that having a successful and quality bus service in an urban area will increase home values. Even if the service is poorly designed, this will have the opposite effect, making homes less valuable (Rosiers et al. 2010). Can be.