Topic > Why artists' morality should not interfere with their art

Like many human beings, there will be a time when we go through difficult times and need to express our feelings. This can be verbally or physically. In other words we express our emotions through art. Art is considered to be the process or product of arranging elements in a way that appeals to the senses or emotions. It covers a wide range of human activities, creations and modes of expression, including music, literature, film, sculpture and painting. The personal functions of art are often created by the need for self-expression. The artist may have wanted to communicate a thought or point to the viewer. A piece may have been intended only to entertain others. An artist's mistakes or lifestyle should not interfere with his art. Judging an artist based on his actions should not interfere with his art because what we praise is his art and not how morally good he is. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay R&B artist Chris Brown was arrested in February 2009 after injuring his girlfriend Rihanna. As was mentioned in the article "Chris Brown talks about Rihanna abuse: 'I felt like a monster'." his career was slowly going into decline “With radio stations refusing to play his songs.” Brown was ashamed of his actions. He would look at photos of Rihanna's bruised face and say she felt like a monster. Brown was in disbelief at his actions. He states, “I look back at that picture and say, 'That's not me, bro. I still hate it to this day. This will haunt me forever.'” Brown was held accountable for his actions. He was arrested, served five years probation and a community service order for the assault. Since the incident between Chris Brown and Rihanna there has not been another incident of aggression involving Brown, which proves that even artists make mistakes. It was a terrible mistake. While Brown's popularity might have been an advantage in "throwing under the rug" this incident, he was still held responsible for it. One mistake or accusation should not interfere with his art. Brown released a couple of hits and expressed how ashamed and hurt he was because of his actions. The article "Chris Brown's 20 Biggest Billboard Hits" informs us that since Brown's accident in 2009, he has returned to the scene with the song "I can transform ya”, 'in an instant becoming Brown's winning signatures: a production pulsating, notable guest Lil Wayne and jovial lyrics.'” Brown has had other bigger hits since his return to the scene with “I can Transform ya.” If Brown's fans can forget his personal mistakes and still a support him, making his songs the biggest billboard hits, why shouldn't his art be supported?. the Brown incident, it was proven that even though an artist can make mistakes, his supporters didn't allow that his personal mistakes interfere with his art. There are many songs about drugs, scams and murders. However, this does not take away from how good they are art. Charles McGrath argues that “In the case of the artist, badness or goodness is a moral quality or judgment; in the case of his art, goodness and badness are terms of aesthetic merit, to which morality does not apply." In other words he states that there can be a separation between art and the artist. Artists are valued more for their art than their actions. In.