Adapted by many countries around the world, the democratic system continues to be an evolving topic of discussion due to its requirement that the mass population vote for a leader based on own personal choices and choices. understanding who will help the society to progress further with its rationalities and strengths in different sectors of the country such as politics, social sectors and economy. Among the various individuals who oppose democracy is Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. who does not trust democracy. It chooses to focus on how our chosen political representatives manipulate us (the mass majority) and deceive us rather than highlighting the truth about our progress and problems as a society. Furthermore, it targets the implications that corrupt and negligent leaders can have on society; poverty and hunger are among these implications. Furthermore, Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. highlights the results of a dishonest leader who can create a ripple effect by using all of society's resources for himself and leaving us citizens deprived of the resources we have created ourselves and have lost control. Although he presents his arguments with thoughtful articulation, errors are detected through the use of fallacies as these help us see through the faulty evidence that Fred Ptarmigan Winkles, Sr. failed to identify while presenting his arguments. Winkles begins his essay by describing the good things the media has told us about democracy and moves on to what President Bush once said about democracy. He had said that "on earth we are all more or less equal, and we all just want to be free", which brings us to the first mistake in Winkle's essay. How can he say that on earth everyone is equal and that...... middle of paper...... which makes his essay weak in various ways, such as his lack of consideration of the positive effects of democracy. Winkle focuses exclusively on the negative implications that democracy has on some countries (North Korea and Congo to be precise) and does not mention the other various countries that have perfectly adapted to democracy and continue to develop in all major sectors. Due to weak arguments, lack of credible evidence, emphasis only on negative effects, and lack of misjudgments, Winkle fails to prove the truth of his main conclusion, although he confirms that he clearly rejects the idea of ​​democracy. He fails to establish why democracy is an insufficient system as errors are constantly shown in his arguments. I therefore directly oppose his rejection of democracy because he fails to justify his judgments.